| |
 |
|
Chapter 9
|
|
|
CATHOLIC CAMPAIGN OF DENIAL, SMEAR AND FALSIFICATION
By Avro Manhattan
|
Rumours of the forcible conversions of the Ustashi
massacres began to leak out of the Independent Catholic State of Croatia
from its earliest stage. At first they received hardly any credence.
That people should be killed for their religion could not be accepted in
the middle of the 20th Century.
Yet the tales of individual witnesses, when added to
the stories of Italian Fascist troops and even Nazi ones, could not be
ignored forever. In view also of the fact that many described the
Croatian horrors in their letters home, some having even taken "snaps"
of the deeds.
When, finally, these could no longer be denied,
counterrumors began to circulate to the effect that they were
anti-Catholic propaganda, anti-Croat lies. Indeed, even "Gestapo-cooked"
inventions. The Croats and their Catholic supporters accused the Nazis,
the Communists, the Serbs, and even the Allies, in turn, of having
started the atrocity stories.
Since evidence, however, went on accumulating, they
were finally compelled to adopt three well defined tactics, which they
carried out with simultaneous consistency: (a) the prevention of the
arrival of fresh news; (b) the playing down or minimization, and even
denial, of what had already become known; and (c) a smear campaign
against all and sundry engaged upon telling about events in Croatia.
The intrigues, lies, plots and utter falsification
directed to these ends became a grand strategy in themselves. We shall
content ourselves with a few characteristic examples, since each is
typical of the methods adopted from the very beginning.
In 1941 Dr. Milosh Sekulich, then in Nazi-occupied
Yugoslavia, was charged with a mission of a military, political and
ecclesiastical nature: to take certain important documents to the Allied
Headquarters in London. Those who sent him: General Mihailovich, leader
of the Chetnik forces, and the Bishops of the Orthodox Church of Serbia.
Having accepted, he undertook the perilous journey,
left Yugoslavia and successfully reached Istanbul, Turkey on 27th
September, 1941. The exiled Yugoslav Government in London, having been
informed of Dr. Sekulich's task, proposed on 6th October, 1941, on the
initiative of their Premier, General Simovich, that the trip to London
be financed by the Government. In view of the importance of the Doctor's
mission, the Premier's motion was unanimously accepted.
Assured of the blessing of the Yugoslav Government,
Dr. Sekulich then proceeded to Egypt. From Egypt he went to the Sudan,
from there to the Congo, and finally to Lagos. It must be remembered
that at this period the Fascist and Nazi armies were in control of North
Africa and of the Mediterranean. Once in Lagos, however, he had to stop.
The funds had been cut short. What had happened?
A Minister of the Yugoslav Government in charge of
Finances, a devout Catholic Croat, had withdrawn the necessary money.
Unable to proceed further, Dr. Sekulich, with his
documents, would have to remain in deepest Africa for "the duration."
The evidence of the forcible conversions and Catholic massacres in this
manner would never reach the Allies. Or, at least, would be greatly
delayed.
The Croat's plan almost succeeded. But for the
generosity of a Czechoslovak, the Manager of Bata in Lagos.
Dr. Sekulich brought to London two important
documents: one hidden in the sole of his shoes and the other sewn into
the lining of his suit. (A) A map of Mihailovich's Chetnik Headquarters,
(B) two Appeals by the Serbian Orthodox Church, sent first to General
Schroeder, Commander-in-Chief of the Nazi occupational forces in Serbia
and then to General Dunkelmann, who had replaced General Schroeder. In
these two appeals, the Serbian Orthodox Church asked the Nazi Generals
to intervene with Ante Pavelic to stop the massacre of the Serbs. The
documents began as follows:
"The persecutions of the Orthodox Serbs started from
the very beginning of the existence of the Independent State of
Croatia... Following the departure of the German and Italian occupying
troops (in 1941) persecution, plunder, torture of the Serbs, which until
then had been checked, turned into a veritable program, directed at a
complete extermination of the Orthodox Serbian people. Catholic
Croatian Minister, Dr. Lile Budak, Dr. Milovan Zanic, Dr. Mirko Puk, and
the Ustashi leader Dr. Victor Gutic competed against each other to
incite the Croatians against the Orthodox Serbs.
"As a result of such policy, thousands of Serbs were
taken to concentration camps, Orthodox priests and their families were
arrested, the birth, marriages and deaths registers of the Orthodox
Church were handed over to the Catholic diocesan authorities, Orthodox
Churches were destroyed, monasteries plundered, and the Serbian people
forced to abandon their Orthodox religion and adopt Catholicism. We are
sorry to have to relate that in all these misdeeds, the Catholic clergy
also participated....
"We estimate that, so far (August 8th, 1941), the
number of people killed surpasses 180,000....
"One of the first victims of Ustashi terror was
Platon, Bishop of Banjaluka, together with the Orthodox Canon Dusan
Subotich, of Bosanska Gradishka. They were murdered on the night of
5th-6th June, 1941, on the road between Banjaluka and Kotor Varos. Their
bodies were thrown into the river Vrbanja....
"Canon Branko Dobosavljevic, of Vljuna district of
Slunj, who was ordered by the Ustashi to dig the grave of his own son, a
student.... In the end he, too, was tortured and killed on the same
spot. Their killer: Ustashi Ivan Scheifer, a teacher....
"The Orthodox priest, Djordje Bogic, of Nasice, killed
18th June, 1941. Priest Bogic was tied to a tree and tortured. They
first cut off his ears, nose and tongue, then pulled off his beard
together with the skin. He died only after they ripped open his
chest....
"Dusan Brankovic, a Member of Parliament, had his
throat cut on 19th June, 1941....
"Dr. Veljko Torbica, who, before being killed near
Gracica had his flesh cut into slices and salt put into his wounds....
"Milos Teslitch, a manufacturer of Sisak. His body was
washed ashore from the river Sava with his eyes stubbed out, flesh cut
off his face, and his whole body covered with knife slashes... The
Ustashi photographed themselves with this disfigured body...."The
Metropolitan of Zagreb, Dositej, Bishop Nikolaj of Mostar
 |
|
On the left, Bogdanovic,
executed by the Communists, beside Disan Brancovic.
Brancovic, a Member of Parliament, was executed without even
the presence of legality. Prior to his murder, the Ustashi
amused themselves by slashing his chest with knives and
ultimately scooped his eyes from their sockets. He was a
close friend of Dr. Milos Sekulich (third from left), the
man |
|
whom the Orthodox Church of Serbia charged with taking
their appeals and documentation of the Ustashi atrocities to
the Allies in London. |
The Ustashi tortured and
executed Members of Parliament, including Orthodox clergy
and Bishops. Very often they seized their relatives, whom
they sent to concentration camps or forced to become
Catholics.
The Ustashi persecuted
Orthodox personalities even after the collapse of Hitler and
of Ustashi Croatia. Going so far even as to terrorize their
fellow Croatians abroad by extorting "contributions" from
them for the cause and by planting bombs in homes and public
places, e.g., West Germany in 1964, Australia in 1965, and
the USA in 1967.
 |
|
One of the most horrifying
documents of Ustashi brutality, Milos Teslitch, an Orthodox
Serb industrialist, after having been burned in the town of
Sisak. One Ustashi is holding the heart of the victim. The
photograph was taken as a souvenir by an Ustashi who took
part in the execution. Mainly responsible for this
|
|
notorious crime was Catholic Faget. The Ustashi did not hesitate
to crucify their victims, e.g. Luka Avramovitch, former
Member of Parliament, and his son, who were both crucified
and then burned in their own home in Mliniste, in the
district of Glamoc. |
On the 20th August 1941 the
Ustashi took all Orthodox Serbs to the woods of Koprivnica,
between Bugojeo and Kupres, and killed the lot. Before the
massacre, women had their breasts cut, arms and legs broken.
Some men were blinded by way of having their eyes cut with
knives.
During the night of 31st
July/ Ist August 1941, in the town of Prijedor, the Ustashi
massacred 1,400 people. The Nazis were so horrified that
they occupied the town and compelled the Ustashi to leave. |
and Bishop Sava Trlajic of Plasko, with many of their
priests, were all deported... Today there are no longer any Orthodox
priests in Croatia, except for those arrested. To realize the
seriousness of these measures, it should be remembered that there are
eight Orthodox Dioceses in the Independent State of Croatia, with a
large number of clergy, all of whom are now missing... In this manner
the Serbian people are entirely without their spiritual leaders, left to
the mercy of the Ustashi and of the Catholic clergy...."
The Appeals thereupon gave numerous accounts of the
crimes committed until then by the Ustashi, some of which we have
already examined. Faced by such circumstantial evidence, Catholic
propagandists then engaged upon a campaign of vituperation and
distortion. They began by saying that Dr. Sekulich was a Gestapo Agent.
This, although as soon as he arrived in London Dr. Sekulich had been
received by Mr. Leopold Amery, Minister of State for India and
right-hand man of Winston Churchill, then British Premier.
At the same time they asserted that the "atrocity
stories" were lies. Sava Kosanovich, Yugoslav Minister, declared from
the USA "This is the work of Nazi and Fascist propaganda... to which
some people have lent themselves as naive accomplices." (November 1941).
Others affirmed that only the Ustashi had committed
the crimes. "I repudiate all attempts to associate the Croatian people
with Pavelic and his Ustashi," said Catholic Croat Dr. Subavich,
Governor of Croatia in exile, "or to accuse them of the massacres which
are going on...if they are going on, " he ended. (15th November 1941).
In spite of denials and distortions, the fact remained
that the Croatian atrocities had occurred. And no one knew about their
authenticity better than the members of the Yugoslav Government. Should
they lend their authoritative voice to the Appeals of the Serbian
Orthodox Church?
There followed a serious crisis. Croat and Slovene
members, all Catholics, threatened the Government with an irreparable
split.
At this time it must not be forgotten that the
paramount concern of the exiled Government was to remain united. That
is, to keep together the three main nationalities—Serbs, Croats and
Slovenes—which formed Yugoslavia, and so prevent the disintegration of
the Kingdom, while at the same time offering a united front against
Hitler.
To avoid a major split, the Government finally decided
NOT to publish the news of the massacres. Indeed, to remain silent, and
even to deny altogether that they had occurred.
Notwithstanding this decision, however, the news soon
leaked out. The News Chronicle published an article about them
(3rd January 1942), "180,000 die in Serb Terror. Mass murders of men,
women and children are described by the Archbishop of the Serbian
Orthodox Church in a document which has reached the Yugoslav Legation in
London. It is the most ghastly record of bestiality yet compiled during
the present war.... In the village of Korito, the Archbishops records,
163 peasants were tortured, tied into bundles of three and thrown into a
pit. Some were found still alive, so the Ustashi threw in bombs to
finish them off..."
"...266 bodies are consigned to this pit. Subsequently
petrol was poured into it and set alight. More than 600 people were
killed in and around Krupa between July 25th and 30th. Most of them had
been cut to pieces with knives, axes and scythes. In one place, four
Orthodox Serbs were crucified on the doors of their houses, tortured and
finally killed with knives," reported the Daily Telegraph (3rd
January 1942). "It is suggested that the names (of the criminals) should
go before an international court of justice to be set up after the
war..."
The Press releases created a sensation. There were
protests on both sides of the Atlantic, led by the Archbishop of
Canterbury. The Catholics set in motion a by-focal campaign of
minimization and defamation. One of its most successful promoters was an
American Catholic left-winger, of Slovene origin, Louis Adamic. Adamic
set out to prove to the American people that the massacres were not
true. Or that, if true, they had been rigged. And, last but not least,
that the "Chetnik Courier," as he labeled Dr. Sekulich, was a Nazi
Agent.
Since Adamic's tactics were universally adopted during
and after the war, it might be instructive to glance at them.According
to him: "the atrocities were all propaganda...to stir up
anti-Catholicism..." However, to give the impression of "impartiality,"
Adamic eventually explained, in a book entitled My Native Land,
how he dealt with the issue.
"What could we do," he wrote, referring to the news of
the Croatian horrors. "There just might be some basis for these horrible
stories... (note his reluctant admission).... None of our little group
in New York could get into occupied Yugoslavia to investigate the facts.
The nearest we could get was London.
"The following resume includes facts learned and
corroborated," he continued. "Large scale massacres of Serbians in
Croatia occurred. But," he commented, "the total number of victims was
not anywhere near 180,000 (the lowest figure previously reported).
Reliable estimates from inside Yugoslavia were TENS OF THOUSANDS ONLY.
"Secondly, "the massacres were not perpetrated by the
Croatian people, but by the Ustashi."
Thirdly, "Yes, Catholic priests converted the
Orthodox," Adamic admitted, but "Catholic priests in Croatia accompanied
Ustashi murder squads and 'converted' thousands of Orthodox Serbians to
Catholicism under the threat of death from Ustashi guns, much as the
Spanish padres accompanying the conquistadors 'converted' the Central
and South American Indians."
Adamic could not deny the existence of photographs.
But no one should believe them, he commented. Here are his words:
Photographs of the massacres existed. I saw them.
Some were horrible beyond utterance. There were pictures of vast
piles of bodies, of stacked up heads, tubfulls of necklaces of human
eyes... But only a few looked authentic...it was clear that most of
them were arranged by Gestapo photographers. In two or three
pictures, men in the garb of Catholic priests were among Ustashi.
After which Adamic drew his own conclusion:
ALL OR MOST of the pictures," he said, "were taken by
Gestapo agents, who turned them over to Serbian Orthodox clergymen...
The Orthodox priests reacted just as the Gestapo had expected... They
must get this information to the Yugoslav Government in London... The
Gestapo helped to arrange this. A Serbian messenger, Dr. Sekulich, got
out of Axis-occupied Yugoslavia with a German and a Quisling
passport...and gave the photographs, the report of a puppet bishop, and
other documents - all Gestapo approved - to the Yugoslav diplomatic
officials in Istanbul. The material was then rushed to London by the
same courier, Sekulich... British authorities arrested him...as a Nazi
Agent...but he was released on the insistence of the Yugoslav
Government's inner clique...."The inner clique,'' continued Adamic,
"relayed the Gestapo information about the massacres by diplomatic pouch
to Fotich in Washington and elsewhere... It also submitted the story to
the Bishop (sic) of Canterbury, who reacted just as the clique, and
Hitler, desired...." and so on.
Adamic's tactics were too good to be ignored. He was
the Catholic spearhead of another Catholic master truth-distorter who
was to plague the USA a decade later, Senator Joseph McCarthy. As with
Senator McCarthy, so also with Adamic the ponderous Catholic machinery
was set in motion to promote the Adamic line.
The Catholic and Catholic-controlled Press and Radio
of the U.S.A. and Allied Governments followed suit. Result: the
atrocities were minimized, their genuineness questioned when not
attributed to anti-Catholic propaganda, and finally they were forgotten.
Had the Adamic lobby been confined to that, it would have been bad
enough. But it succeeded in preventing the truth from reaching quarters
with sufficient authority to prevent the prolongation of the situation,
e.g. the President of the USA. For Adamic and his supporters had,
indeed, managed to get the ear of President Roosevelt himself.
The insidiousness of the Adamic technique can be
judged by the fact that Adamic was eventually to give account to Dr.
Sekulich in court. Another wrongly accused victim: Winston Churchill.
Adamic's book, Dinner at the White House, (to quote the Law
Report, January 15th, 1947, High Court of Justice) "purported to be a
description of a dinner party given at the White House by the late
President Roosevelt, at which Mr. Winston Churchill, then Prime
Minister, and the author were present. With this dinner as the starting
point, the book proceeded to a criticism of both Mr. Churchill
personally . . . and of his actions and supposed policy in relation to
the war..."
In this book Mr. Adamic insinuated that "the motives
of the British Policy in Greece were at least partly linked to the fact
that Hambro's Bank of London, the chief British creditors of Greece
(getting up to 17 per cent on their loans) had bailed Winston Churchill
out of bankruptcy in 1912...."A grosser libel upon a public man holding
the high position which Mr. Churchill held is difficult to conceive...
But the reflection made upon his solvency is as nothing to the
suggestion that in his capacity of Prime Minister he had allowed his
private feelings and his private interests to sway and influence the
policy and conduct of public affairs by the Government of which he was
the head, and especially in regard to operations of war in which blood
was shed."
[1]
Churchill, like Sekulich, issued a writ for libel
action. Four years later, in 1951, Mr. Adamic was shot dead in Milford,
USA. The reality of the Catholic massacres and forcible conversions
remained hazy to many people: not only because of their incredible
nature, but also because of the Catholic lobby. The present author
himself for some years remained skeptical about them. Used as he was to
the saturation technique of war propaganda (being, at that time,
employed in the Intelligence and Political Warfare of the Allies' war
machine), even after meeting Dr. Sekulich he accepted the Croatian
atrocities with skepticism. It took some years before finally he became
convinced of their veracity. During this time he contacted Yugoslavs of
all classes. From General Mirkovich, the man who caused the overthrow of
the Yugoslav Government when the latter signed a pact with Hitler and
thus brought his country into the Allies' camp (1941) to the humblest
manual worker.
Not content with this, the author personally
interrogated numerous Orthodox Serbs, and even Catholic Croats, who had
been eyewitnesses of the Ustashi massacres. Indeed, he even met victims
who had escaped them. In addition to which, on the 20th May 1951, Dr.
Sekulich, General Mirkovich and he held a special meeting in London.
This was attended by victims of the Ustashi residing in England, from
whom further documentation was received. All authenticated with names,
dates and places.A typical case was that related by a survivor of the
Ustashi, Vojislav Zivanic (father, Duko; brother, Bogoljub), from
Dukovsko, before witnesses and under oath, which we have already
mentioned elsewhere. In June 1943 an Ustashi contingent, passing through
the village of Zijimet, rounded up seventy-four villagers, put them into
a shed, and set this on fire. Among the victims were the aunt of the
eyewitness and her two children. This man lost twenty-five members of
his family, all burned alive.
The author of this book was not the only doubter of
the Croatian nightmare. Thousands of others shared his skepticism. The
result of the insidious Catholic brainwashing propaganda, promoted by
Catholics who had adopted Adamic's techniques. An early victim was an
illustrious personage who, because of her status and that of her
husband, gave added significance to the damage which the Catholic Adamic
falsifications of history worked in responsible places. Not long after
Mr. Winston Churchill took Adamic to Court (1947), the present author,
at a private dinner party in Upper Brook Street, Mayfair, London, met
Mrs. Eleanor
Roosevelt, wife of the late American
President. Since, at this period, the author was engaged upon his
inquiries concerning the authenticity of the Ustashi, he asked Mrs.
Roosevelt whether she had ever heard of them.
One of the worst, if not the worse, crimes of the
war, was her prompt reply. I heard of them in the winter of 1941-2.
Neither I nor my husband at first believed them to be true.
"I did not believe them either," the present author
commented. I assumed them to be propaganda."
We thought the same, replied Mrs. Roosevelt. "The
Catholic lobby was the most successful at the White House for years."
Had she ever heard of an American author, L. Adamic?
She had. One of the many who had persuaded her husband that the atrocity
stories from Croatia had been concocted by the Nazi propaganda machine.
Could she explain why these Catholic atrocities were not as well known
as the Nazi ones? Nazi Germany is no more," replied Mrs. Roosevelt. "The
Catholic Church is still here with us. More powerful than ever. With her
own Press and the World Press at her bidding. Anything published about
the atrocities in the future will not be believed...."The present author
thereupon told her he was writing a book about them."Your book might
convince a few," she commented. "But what about the hundreds of millions
already brainwashed by Catholic propaganda?" A few years later, in 1953,
when the book was eventually published, although two editions were sold
within weeks, no part of the British or American Press dared even to
mention it.
The Yugoslav Government bought a few thousand copies,
which were distributed free to the members of the House of Commons and
House of Lords. Apart from a massive silence from both Houses, the only
comments to reach the author were "utter nonsense," "rubbish" and
"things of the past." And "even if true, why revive them now?" Mrs.
Roosevelt had been right.[2]
During 1942, however, news of the massacres finally
reached the outside world. And while the majority of Catholics denied or
minimized them, not a few condemned them, e.g. Dr. Ivan Chok, a Catholic
Slovene, who on 15th March 1942 ended a broadcast by saying "the long
arm of justice will surely reach the guilty ones, to punish them
mercilessly."Another Slovene, Dr. Kuhar, a Catholic priest, in the
Catholic Herald, 20th February 1942, and in the Catholic Times,
22nd February 1942, repudiated the Croatian methods of forcible
conversion. "We as Catholics...have the right and have the duty to
condemn with all our might any conversion to our faith by force," he
wrote. Dr. Vilder, a Croat and a Catholic, during a broadcast condemned
not only the atrocities but also those who tacitly encouraged them.
"Orthodox people are being forcibly converted to Catholicism, and yet we
do not hear one single word of protest from Archbishop Stepinac," he
said (16th March 1942). Another Catholic Croat, Mr. Jerich, who escaped
from Yugoslavia, issued a declaration jointly with a Dalmatian Croat,
Mate Ruskovich (23rd July 1943): "We protest against mass massacre and
forced Catholicization of Serbian Orthodox population...."
Catholics and non-Catholics alike not only protested,
but addressed themselves to the Catholic authorities, both in Croatia
and in Rome. Their protests, however, fell upon deaf ears. While
Archbishop Stepinac and Pope Pius Xll went on giving ever more frequent
thanks to a merciful God for the increasing number of forcible
conversions, additional protesting voices began to be heard with
mounting insistence within and without Croatia. The sneers of those who
at first had regarded the news as a crude form of anti-Catholic
propaganda, as reliable information began to leak out ceased and gave
way, first to astonishment and then to horror. Appeals were made to
Stepinac, the Pope and the Allies from all over Europe. Not only from
Serbs, who had every reason for letting the world know, but also from
Catholics, who could not accept such a bloody degradation of their
religion. Some lodged horrified protests with Archbishop Stepinac, and,
indeed, direct with the Vatican. Perhaps one of the most outstanding was
that written by Prvislav Grizogono.
Grizogono was a Minister of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia,
a Croat, and a devout Catholic. Yet nothing could more eloquently indict
his Church than his letter, the words of which were most carefully
considered and scrupulously weighed:"
Your Grace: I write this to you as man to man, as
a Christian to a Christian. Since the first day of the Independent
Croatian State the Serbs have been massacred (in Gospich, Gudovac,
Bos. Krajina, etc.) and this massacring has continued to this day.
He follows with a detailed enumeration of some of the
crimes perpetrated. After which he concludes:"
Why do I write this to you? Here is why: In all
these unprecedented crimes, worse than pagan our Catholic Church has
also participated in two ways. First, a large number of priests,
clerics, friars and organized Catholic youth actively participated
in all these crimes, but more terrible even Catholic priests became
camp and group commanders, and as such ordered or tolerated the
horrible tortures, murders and massacres of a baptized people. None
of this could have been done without the permission of their
Bishops, and if it was done, they should have been brought to the
Ecclesiastical Court and unfrocked. Since this did not happen, then
ostensibly the Bishops gave their consent by acquiescence at least.
The Catholic Church has used all means to Catholicize forcibly the
remaining Serbs... The province of Stem is covered with the leaflets
of Bishop Aksamovitch, printed in his own printing shop at Djakovo.
He calls upon the Serbs, through these leaflets, to save their lives
and property, recommending the Catholic faith to them.' What will
happen to us Croats if the impression is formed that we participated
in all these crimes to the finish? Again it is the duty of the
Church to raise its voice: first because it is a Church of Christ;
second because it is powerful. I write to you this, about such
terrible crimes, to save my soul, and I leave it to you to find a
way to save yours.
Signed, Prvislav Grizogono, former Minister of the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia. At Zemun, February 8, 1941.
Not content with that, Dr. Grizogono dispatched
another letter to the Catholic Archbishop of Belgrade, Dr. Ujchich, who
seemed sympathetic to his request. In it the Catholic former Minister of
Yugoslavia begged the Archbishop to ask the Pope to order the Catholic
Hierarchy to stop the mounting Ustashi terror by the prompt enforcement
of ecclesiastical discipline and, if necessary the use of papal
authority. Did the Archbishop of Belgrade state that the persecutions
were pure fabrications or, at least, were grossly exaggerated? The
Archbishop denied nothing. In fact, by his reply he confirmed their
authenticity. Indeed, he disclosed that he was fully conversant with
what was then happening. Here is what he wrote to Dr. Grizogono:
I thank you for your letter. The information about
the massacres we have already received from many different sources.
I have forwarded everything to the Vatican, and I believe that
everything possible will be done.
[3]
The outcries of the civilized world echoed as vainly
in the halls of the Catholic Hierarchy as in those of the Vatican. The
saintly Pope and the worthy Archbishop were mute. Their silence cost the
lives of 850,000 men, women and children, the bloodiest religious
massacre of the century. Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum—Such evil
deeds could religion inspire.
Footnotes
1. The Times, London, January 16, 1947,
Law Report, January 15, 1947, High Court of Justice.[Back]
2. Terror over Yugoslavia, Watts, London,
1953.[Back]
3. The authenticity of his reply was personally
confirmed by Dr. Grizogono's son, Dr. N. Grizogono, a practicing
Catholic. For further details, see Ally Betrayed, by David
Martin, 1946. Archbishop Stepinac wrote to Pavelich about the
conversions—More than once. See Mgr. Stepinac's long letter to Pavelich
on the conversions, first translated and published by Hubert Butler.[Back]
|
|